Weetra can examine the documentary basis of a CBAM file within an engagement led by a legal adviser, customs professional or other trusted intermediary.
Regulatory content last reviewed14 September 2026
A lawyer, customs professional or other adviser can use the Evidence Check as a focused first check. Where the mandate is adviser-led, the end client remains the adviser’s client. Weetra reviews the available evidence, identifies visible gaps and contradictions, and recommends deeper review only when the findings justify it.
The end client remains the adviser’s client. Within the agreed mandate, Weetra provides the specialist evidence review without taking over legal advice, customs work or client management. The review can therefore sit inside an existing adviser-led engagement without creating a second advisory relationship or changing who leads the client strategy.
Legal interpretation remains with legal counsel. Customs classification, representation and filing remain with the relevant customs professional or authorised declarant. Accredited verification remains with an appropriately accredited verifier. Weetra is responsible for the scope and quality of its own review and for the Weetra conclusion it issues. Direct contact with the end client, producer or supplier occurs only where the mandate expressly provides for it. The adviser retains control of the client relationship, legal interpretation, customs strategy and any decision on how Weetra findings are used.
It allows an adviser to add a specialised evidence-review capability without building a separate internal review system or transferring the client relationship. The result provides a clear documentary record that can support later legal, customs, verification or management work. It adds depth without fragmenting responsibility across parallel advisers.
Discuss an adviser-led review →
The review record is prepared for later professional use. It shows the adviser which documents were examined, what was found, what remains unresolved, what changed during follow-up and the basis of the Weetra Determination.
A focused first review when the adviser needs to know whether the file warrants deeper work and, if so, at what depth.
A focused documentary review when the question is what the existing file currently supports.
A deeper documentary review when several sources, suppliers, installations or inconsistencies need to be reconciled and followed up.
A detailed review for complex or disputed files that are likely to face deeper scrutiny.
View CBAM specimen series →Case Library
By default, communications stay with the adviser. If direct clarification with the end client, producer or supplier would materially improve the evidence record, that contact takes place only within the agreed mandate. Weetra remains a specialist support function, not a parallel adviser.
€490 excl. VAT per dossier
Request an Evidence CheckWhen a deeper review is commissioned, Weetra records what was received, what was relied on, what conflicted, what was corrected, what changed and why the final conclusion was reached. That history makes the file easier for an adviser, verifier or authority to understand later.
Client → Adviser / Customs Professional → Weetra Evidence Check or review → findings, questions and corrections and, where applicable, Determination → output returned within the professional mandate → adviser continues to manage the client relationship. The end client can remain the adviser’s client throughout.
The Evidence Check can help distinguish a file that needs a simple correction from one that justifies Level I, Level II or expert escalation. That makes it easier to scope the next step without committing the client to an unnecessary review.
Depending on scope, Weetra can return structured findings, requests for missing documents, documented inconsistencies, points requiring correction, a Determination under professional responsibility and, where applicable, a Determination Package showing the reviewed file and how it changed.
Weetra does not replace the adviser’s legal opinion, customs representation, professional judgement or the statutory role of an accredited verifier.
A client file contains a supplier workbook, customs documents and an operator emissions report. The Evidence Check identifies a quantity mismatch and a missing monitoring-plan version. The adviser remains the client lead, obtains the missing material, and instructs a deeper review only if the corrected file still justifies it.
Each finding identifies the documents concerned, what appears to be missing or inconsistent, why it matters, the corrective action to consider and the next step.
Start with the evidence already available. Receive findings, correct or obtain evidence, stop if no deeper work is needed, or move to a deeper review only where the file justifies it. If no deeper review is required, no further engagement is recommended.
A deeper Weetra review can record what was received, what conflicted, what changed, what was corrected, what was ultimately relied on and why the conclusion was reached. That history can later support internal review, professional advice, accredited verification or authority scrutiny.
The model is designed to sit inside an existing legal, customs or compliance mandate without creating a parallel advisory relationship by default.
| Role | Retains responsibility for |
|---|---|
| Legal counsel | Legal interpretation, advice, privilege strategy and representation. |
| Customs professional | Customs classification, representation, filing and customs strategy within its mandate. |
| Accredited verifier | Independent regulated verification under the applicable CBAM framework. |
| Weetra | Scope and quality of its documentary review, factual/evidence findings and any Determination it issues within the agreed mandate. |
Direct contact with the end client, producer or supplier occurs only when the mandate provides for it. Weetra does not treat an adviser-led file as an invitation to solicit the end client independently.
