Your EU customers may rely on emissions and installation information supplied by you. The question is whether the evidence package behind those values can actually be reconstructed.
Depending on the file, the review can examine installation identity, products, CN context, production route, reporting period, production quantity, monitoring plan, activity data, fuel and electricity data, emission factors, allocation, embedded-emissions calculation, precursors, verification relationships, documentary versions and supporting source records.
Monitoring Plan referenced: v3.2
Monitoring Plan supplied: v3.1.
Production quantity used in the emissions calculation cannot currently be reconciled with the production record supplied.
Precursor emissions are reported but the upstream installation evidence was not supplied.
The Evidence Check is WEETRA’s entry screening layer. Review Levels I–III add human-governed documentary review, deeper reconstruction and formal review outputs according to scope.
WEETRA compares calculated data supplied to customers with source records for the same installation, product population and reporting period. The comparison highlights documentary gaps and contradictions and produces an actionable view of the evidence package supplied to EU customers.
The Evidence Check produces a shareable PDF that records the reviewed scope, the evidence population, identified documentary relationships, findings and the actions that require attention.
Organisation role, reporting period, documents analysed and the main relationships identified.
Evidence gaps, potential contradictions, source limitations, relationship gaps, period or quantity issues and human-review triggers.
A clear action for each material finding and a proportionate next step: client remediation, Level I, Level II or expert review where justified.
