Home/ Determination Package
Determination Package

A reviewed file should still make sense years later.

With a deeper Weetra review, the value is not only the final conclusion. The package can also show what was examined, what changed and which documents ultimately supported that conclusion.

WeetraDetermination Package
PurposeLater reconstruction
BoundaryEvidence Review vs Accredited Verification

What is a Weetra Determination Package?

When included in the mandate, the Determination Package is the record behind the Determination. It links the conclusion to the documents reviewed, the versions used, the questions raised, the corrections received and the analyst’s work.

What can it preserve?

Depending on scope and review depth, the package can include the Determination and an explanation of how it is supported. It can also include the documents reviewed, key information checked, inconsistencies and unresolved points, the history of questions and corrections, the analyst’s review notes, a supporting-document list, file-integrity checks and the relevant versions.

Determination Package

Preserve what was received, what changed, what was corrected and what was relied on.

Why does it matter later?

If the file is questioned later by an adviser, verifier or authority, the package helps show what was received, what changed, what was relied on and what could not be fully confirmed at the review cut-off.

It does not replace the source documents.

The package organises the review history. It does not replace the original documents, and accredited verification remains the responsibility of the appropriate accredited verifier.

Discuss your file →

Regulatory basis

Why preserve the reviewed record?

A CBAM file may need to be understood years after the original reporting work. The Determination Package keeps a clear record of the documents reviewed, the issues found, the corrections made and the basis of the conclusion. It is not a statutory CBAM report.

Regulatory references provide the legal context. Weetra does not provide legal advice or accredited verification.

Commercial journey

From the original file to the reviewed record

Example: Monitoring Plan v3.1 is received, but the calculation refers to v3.2. Clarification is requested and v3.2 is supplied. A second issue then appears: the production quantity does not reconcile. A reconciliation is provided, the review is completed and the Determination is issued. Three years later, the file can still show what was first received, what changed, which replacement document was used and why the conclusion was reached.

Commercial journey

What may be included

Depending on the mandate, the package may include the Determination, an explanation of how the conclusion is supported, the documents reviewed, key information checked, issues and unresolved points, the history of questions and corrections, the analyst’s review notes, a supporting-document list, file-integrity checks and the relevant versions.

Commercial journey

What those components mean in practice

The explanation of how the conclusion is supported shows which documents support each important figure or statement. The document list shows what was examined. Key information checked records the figures and facts that mattered. Issues and unresolved points remain visible. The history of questions and corrections shows what changed during the review. The analyst’s notes record the professional decisions that mattered. The supporting-document list and file-integrity checks help identify the exact material and versions reviewed.

Commercial journey

Why this is different from an archive

An archive stores files. The Determination Package explains how those files were used, which versions mattered, what problems were found and how important issues were resolved.

Commercial journey

What it does not replace

The package does not replace original source records, statutory retention duties, accredited verification, legal advice or an authority decision. It is a Weetra deliverable designed to preserve the reviewed documentary record.

Commercial journey

Why the file still matters later

A later reviewer should not have to rebuild the whole history from a final spreadsheet. The value is being able to see what was received, what changed and what the final conclusion relied on.

Commercial journey

Why the reviewed record matters later

A deeper Weetra review can record what was received, what conflicted, what changed, what was corrected, what was ultimately relied on and why the conclusion was reached. That history can later support internal review, professional advice, accredited verification or authority scrutiny.

Use of outputs

The package is designed for professional use, but it does not bind the next reviewer.

Subject to the engagement terms and confidentiality obligations, a client may use the output for internal review, with its adviser, in preparation for accredited verification, or when explaining the reviewed basis to an authority. The recipient remains free to apply its own legal or verification responsibilities.

Share the conclusion with context

The scope, review cut-off, unresolved points and documents relied on should stay with the Determination rather than being separated from it.

Do not treat it as a certificate

A Weetra output does not guarantee acceptance, replace statutory verification or determine an authority’s decision.

Preserve the source record

The package organises the reviewed history; it does not replace the client’s underlying source records or legal retention duties.